Nicholas Woolf and Christina Silver's publications
Nicholas Woolf's publications
Silver, C., & Woolf, N. H. (2015). From guided instruction to facilitation of learning: The development of Five-level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(5).
Chilton, M. M., Rabinowich, J. R., & Woolf, N. H. (2014). Very low food security in the USA is linked with exposure to violence. Public health nutrition, 17(01), 73-82.
Woolf, N. H. (2014). Analytic strategies and analytic tactics. Keynote address at ATLAS.ti User Conference 2013: Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, Technische Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:83-opus4-44159
Woolf, N. H. & Yim, J. M. J. (2012). The Courtroom-Observation Program of the Utah Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission. Court Review, 47(4), 84-91.
McKenzie, J., Woolf, N. H., VanWinklen, C., & Morgan, C. (2009). Cognition in strategic decision-making: A model of non-conventional thinking capacities for complex situations. Management Decision, 47(2), 209 - 232
Woolf, N. H. & Quinn, J. (2009). Learners’ perceptions of instructional design practice in a situated learning activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 25-43
Woolf, N. H., Burns, M. E., Bosworth, T. W., & Fiore, M. C. (2006). Purchasing health insurance coverage for smoking cessation treatment: Employers describe the most influential information in this decision. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 8(6), 1-9.
Rodriguez, M., Wallace, S., Woolf, N. H., & Mangione, C. (2006). Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(5), 403-409.
Woolf, N. H. & Quinn, J. (2001). Evaluating peer review in an introductory instructional design course. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(2), 3-26.
Lohman , M. C. & Woolf, N. H. (2001). Self-initiated learning activities of experienced public school teachers: Methods, sources, and relevant organizational influences. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 7(1), 59-74
Woolf, N. H. (2000). Report on interviews with women of color in the legal profession for the Utah Task Force on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.
Woolf, N. H. (2000). Report on interviews with attorneys and judges for the Utah Task Force on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.
Woolf, N. H., Harrison, R. S., Parsons, B. V., & McPhee, S. (1999). Report on the Public Hearings of the Utah Task Force on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.
Lohman, M.C. & Woolf, N.H. (1998). Toward a culture of learning in the public schools: A human resource development perspective. Teaching and Change, 5(3-4), 276-293.
Christina Silver's publications
Christina Silver & Nicholas H. Woolf From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Volume 18, Issue 5
Christina Silver & Ann Lewins (2014, 2nd Edition) Using Software in Qualitative Research : A Step-by-Step Guide, Sage Publications
Christina Silver & Jennifer Patashnick (2011) ‘Finding Fidelity : Advancing Audiovisual Analysis using Software’, FQS 12(1), Thematic Issue: Is Qualitative Software Really Comparable?
Christina Silver & Ann Lewins (2010) ‘Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis’ in Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, Barry McGaw (Editors), International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol 6, pp 326-334. Oxford: Elsevier
Christina Silver & Nigel Fielding (2008) Using Computer Packages in Qualitative Research, in Willig C & Stainton-Rogers W (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, London, Sage Publications.
Nick Woolf acted as a consultant to a major study on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System of the State of Utah... Nick's analyses were instrumental in drawing conclusions and allowing us to make constructive recommendations... his timeliness, responsiveness, and research excellence made it a true pleasure to work with him.Jennifer M. J. Yim, Director,
Utah Task Force on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Legal System
We're really excited to have submitted to Routledge our manuscripts for three books on the Five-Level QDA method - one each for ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA and NVivo. Nick developed the theory and when we met in 2013 we realized that we had both come to very similar conclusions about the issues involved in teaching and learning to harness CAQDAS packages powerfully. We've since been working together to refine, test and write-up the method.
In an earlier post on CAQDAS critics and advocates I promised to provide evidence for my position that CAQDAS packages are not distancing, de-contextualising, and homogenising, as is sometimes claimed. I have already argued that CAQDAS packages actually bring us closer to our data, and given an illustration of how this can happen, so here I consider the de-contextualizing issue.
In my previous post I argued that using dedicated CAQDAS packages for analysis could bring us closer to our data, rather than distance us from it, as some critics suggest. Here I illustrate this by outlining how different CAQDAS tools can be used in to fulfil a specific analytic task, thus bringing us closer to data.
Let's imagine we are doing a project in which we need to generate an interpretation that is data-driven rather than theory-driven. It could involve one of a number of analytic methods, for example, inductive thematic analysis, narrative analysis, grounded theory analysis, interpretive phenomenological analysis'. Whatever the strategy, an early analytic task may be to familiarize with the transcripts in order identify potential concepts. There are several different ways we could go about fulfilling this analytic task using dedicated CAQDAS packages. Here I discuss three.
In an earlier post on CAQDAS critics and advocates I promised to provide evidence for my position that CAQDAS packages are not distancing, de-contextualising, and homogenising, as is sometimes claimed. So I'm starting a series of posts. First I'm taking the suggestion that the use of CAQDAS distances us from our qualitative data and illustrate why I believe the converse to be true. Here I outline my position, and I'll illustrate my argument with examples in subsequent posts.
As well as our own Five-Level QDA blog Nick and Christina have contributed to other blogs, newsletters and magazines on aspects to do with the use of CAQDAS packages. In addition, there are posts and resources written by others which are related to our work that we think researchers using different CAQDAS packages may find useful. Here we collate these resources for easy access. We will update this post as additional resources come to our attention relate to Five-Level QDA. If you know of something that should be listed here, please let us know.